The Foundation should limit the launch of dapps and products within the network by the same founder or team to ensure focus and protect users.
It’s unacceptable to allow founders of projects that haven’t reached maturity or shown progress since their launch to prioritize profit and value extraction.
One of the pillars of a community is trust, and the Foundation must safeguard its community by protecting everyone from malicious activities like rampant extraction.
Many founders of projects on Berachain have failed to deliver success, made significant profits, and continue to build products on the network. There needs to be stricter control over who is qualified to develop new solutions.
My suggestion is that the Foundation start evaluating Valocracy indicators, clearly separating economic power from decision-making power.
It’s evident that many builders aim for profit, which is fine, the issue arises when this goal takes priority in decision-making, sidelining the well-being of the community, users, and the ecosystem as a whole.
My proposal is that the Foundation begin assessing indicators of adoption, progress, and value creation for the ecosystem, empowering users and members who contribute to these areas to participate in network decisions. This way, those who contribute the most value to the community (not just financially) become valued assets within the network, reducing the influence of whales focused solely on financial returns.
Clear performance indicators that evaluate the value generated by products and builders would strengthen the DAO’s reputation with the community and encourage individuals who may not have significant financial resources but contribute meaningfully in other ways to the ecosystem’s growth.