Request for NECT:HONEY:USDC:USDT0 Reward Vault

Reward Vaults
1

Request for NECT:HONEY:USDC:USDT0 Reward Vault

image
image1600×900 118 KB

Reward Vault Request for NECT:HONEY:USDC:USDT0 Multi Stable Pool

1. Proposer Details

  • Email: gram@burrbear.io

  • Proposer’s project name: BurrBear

  • Proposer’s X account (you will be required to make a post from the X account provided for verification purposes) https://x.com/babbysfirstnft

  • Best Telegram Handle for questions/fixes @babbysfirstnft

The proposer should be affiliated with the protocol or at least one of the tokens in the contract.

  • Affiliation (protocol / one of the tokens in the contract): BurrBear team
  1. Protocol Details
  1. Contract/Pool Details

  • Contract Name NECT:HONEY:USDC:USDT0 Multi Stable Pool

  • Contract Address: https://berascan.com/address/0xb34fca9739249578d93a22ce02bf7fad277bad35

  • Contract Type / Configuration: Standard AMM Pool

  • Describe how the contract works: Multi Token Stableswap forked from Balancer v2 ComposableStablePool Multi Stable Pools | BurrBear

  • Contract Fees: Outline the fee structure: LPs earn fees taken from trades.

  • Existing Liquidity / TVL: Existing liquidity from NECT:HONEY:USDC pool will be imported into this new pool. ~$4.5M TVL, $336M volume as of 5/8/25.

  • Identify any address(es) controlling more than 10% of the contract shares: Team has no liquidity in this pool. Largest token holder (only one above 10%) at the moment is NECT/HONEY/USDC.e pool BeraHub vault.

  • Is the contract upgradable? No

  • Contract Control: Multisig then later Governance (process starting after TGE)

  • Additional details on Contract Control: will switch to governance once BURR token launched

  • Is the contract verified? Yes

  • Can the contract be paused? Swaps can be paused during emergency scenarios, but removing liq will always be functional

  • Does the contract rely on oracles? No

  • (If yes, explain oracle dependency)

4. Token Details

Provide the following details for each token in the contract (up to 5):

Major Token #1:

  • Name: Honey

  • Symbol: HONEY

Major Token #2:

  • Name: USDC.e

  • Symbol: USDC.e

Major Token #3:

  • Name: USD₮(0)

  • Symbol: USDT(0)

For Non-Major Tokens:

(address / type: team, foundation, investor, etc.)

$sNECT vault on BeraHub is the only controller of >10% NECT.

viewable on https://berascan.com/token/0x1ce0a25d13ce4d52071ae7e02cf1f6606f4c79d3#balances

  • Does the project issuing the token have any relationship with current Berachain validators? Infrared, THJ, Kodiak, Smillee, apDAO, Validation Cloud.

  • Total Supply Cap (if any)

NA, NECT is a stablecoin minted off of collateral, as collateral is supplied

  • Circulating Supply 167,378,534

  • Token Type: Stablecoin

  • Provide extra details

Deposit collateral, mint NECT. redeem NECT for collateral → What is Nectar ($NECT)? | Beraborrow

  • Token Control: Permissionless

  • Additional details on Token Control: 90% permissionless 10% multisig

  • Is the token contract verified? Yes

  • Is the token a standard ERC20 or any functions have been customized? (e.g. transfer, balance, mint, burn…)

Custom: Audits | Beraborrow

  • Can the token be paused? No

5. Incentive Token #1

Required Data for Incentive Token:

Incentive Token #1

Tokenomics | BurrBear , Emissions Schedule | BurrBear

  • Identify any address(es) controlling more than 10%
  1. Team multisig 0xf215001faD7b5819eEb414bC0d15810EA208fd5C. See allocation breakdown Tokenomics | BurrBear
  2. Burned token address (total 10% burned) ~ 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD

  • Does the project issuing the token have any relationship with current Berachain validators? Smilee, Blockhunters and many more validators via pool partners who will be bribing on burrbear gauges

  • Total Supply Cap (if any) and Circulating Supply
    Total Supply: 100M with 10M Burned
    Circulating Supply on TGE: 26% sold to community

  • Token Type: Governance

  • If either token is a native stablecoin, LST, or governance token, provide extra details on Use case, Redemption mechanics, Peg stability: Governance | BurrBear

  • Are token contracts upgradable? No

  • Token Control: Multisig pre TGE

  • Additional details on Token Control: Governance post TGE

  • Is the token contract verified? Yes

  • Is the token a standard ERC20 or any functions have been customized? (e.g. transfer, balance, mint, burn…) Standard ERC20

  • Can the token be paused? No

Additional Requirements:

  • Specify how many tokens you plan to allocate for incentives and over what period of time.
    $10,000 USD worth of $BURR per week to start, to be increased in steps as TVL grows.

  • Outline how decisions about token incentives are made (DAO, multi-sig, etc.).

Multisig pre TGE, then post TGE full tokenomics will be made available to transition to DAO governed incentives management. Read more here → Governance | BurrBear

Incentive Token #2

  • Name: POLLEN

  • Symbol: POLLEN

  • Contract Addresses (on Berachain and bridging addresses if cross-chain):
    chain / address: 0xc99e948e9d183848a6c4f5e6c1d225f02f171d79

  • Tokenomics, Distribution, and Vesting (links to official docs, website, etc.) What is POLLEN? | Beraborrow

  • Identify any address(es) controlling more than 10% (address / type: team, foundation, investor, etc.): POLLEN HOLDERS - Google Sheets

  • Does the project issuing the token have any relationship with current Berachain validators? Yes

  • If yes, which one?: Infrared, THJ, Kodiak, Smilee, apDAO, Validation Cloud.

  • Total Supply Cap (if any): 420,000,000

  • Circulating Supply: 45,992,248

  • Token Type: Governance

  • If either token is a native stablecoin, LST, or governance token, provide extra details on Use case:

  • POLLEN is the Beraborrow governance token, enabling active participation in the protocols governance and liquidity incentives.
  • It serves as a way for the protocol to utliise Proof of Liquidity to further the adoption of NECT, without having to create a new rewards vault for every NECT (our stablecoin) use case.
  • POLLEN is a means to increase exposure to Berachain governance through the utility of the Beraborrow protocol.
  • Creating a flywheel where more NECT utility enables more users to use Beraborrow for leverage, thus increasing total interest rates/fees to the Rewards Vault meaning more value can be passed through to incentivise liquidity. And the flywheel repeats.* Are token contracts upgradable?

  • Token Control: (Multisig/Single Owner/RBAC/Permissionless/Governance)

  • Additional details on Token Control

  • Is the token contract verified? Yes

  • Is the token a standard ERC20 or any functions have been customized? (e.g. transfer, balance, mint, burn…) Yes - standard ERC20

  • Can the token be paused? No

Additional Requirements:

  • Specify how many tokens per week you plan to allocate for incentives: 400000
  • Specify for how many weeks you plan to allocate incentives: We plan to incentivise indefinitely but 8 weeks with the amount above and then we will look to shift to dynamic incentives.
  • Outline how decisions about token incentives are made (DAO, multi-sig, etc.). Multisig
  • Incentive Manager address (this address will manage the incentive token, being able to add incentive tokens to the reward vault and change the incentive rate) 0x0907f733BF15f62c71ABE65C71b3A8BCaEe64275

Incentive Token #3

NA, It’s a stablecoin What is Nectar ($NECT)? | Beraborrow

  • Identify any address(es) controlling more than 10%

$sNECT vault on BeraHub](sNECT | Reward Vault | BeraHub) is the only controller of >10% NECT.

viewable on https://berascan.com/token/0x1ce0a25d13ce4d52071ae7e02cf1f6606f4c79d3#balances

  • Does the project issuing the token have any relationship with current Berachain validators? Infrared, THJ, Kodiak, Smillee, apDAO, Validation Cloud.

  • Total Supply Cap (if any)

NA, NECT is a stablecoin minted off of collateral, as collateral is supplied

  • Circulating Supply 167,378,534

  • Token Type: Stablecoin

  • If either token is a native stablecoin, LST, or governance token, provide extra details on Use case, Redemption mechanics, Peg stability:
    Deposit collateral, mint NECT. redeem NECT for collateral → What is Nectar ($NECT)? | Beraborrow

  • Are token contracts upgradable? No

  • Token Control: 90% permissionless 10% multisig

  • Additional details on Token Control: Governance post TGE

  • Is the token contract verified? Yes

  • Is the token a standard ERC20 or any functions have been customized? (e.g. transfer, balance, mint, burn…) Custom: Audits | Beraborrow

  • Can the token be paused? No

Additional Requirements:

  • Specify how many tokens you plan to allocate for incentives and over what period of time.

NECT will be bribed as a backup to BURR at the same USD equivalent rate when BURR is not used for bribing.

  • Outline how decisions about token incentives are made (DAO, multi-sig, etc.).

Multisig.

6. Growth, Community & Ecosystem Impact

Why This Contract Matters:

  • How will this contract benefit Berachain?

Stablecoin liquidity and subsequent volume is essential for future use cases to be enabled on Berachain. The previous HONEY/NECT/USDC.e pool has already facilitated more than 300M volume; we expect this number to go up with the addition of a third major stablecoin.

BurrBear’s BURR token serves as primary incentive for the growth of liquidity for USD stablecoins, then eventually base liquidity for other majors and RWA tokens (starting with twinfinance.io/ going live with tokenized stocks vs 3pool tokens) to give Berachain real world utility as liquidity deepens on chain and the ecosystem matures.

  • Will it deepen liquidity for a major ecosystem token (e.g., BERA, core stable asset)?

Yes - HONEY, USDT and USDC

  • Does it enable important trading pairs that drive adoption or integrate with other Berachain projects?

Yes, upcoming berachain native stablecoins intend to LP against the 4pool: : <4pool LP token> to bootstrap their own liquidity/volume and further build the 4pool (HONEY:NECT:USDC:USDT0) organically without relying on staking rewards alone.

Potential Volume / TVL:

  • Provide metrics or estimates on liquidity you expect to attract.

Already reached $4.5m TVL and $336M volume. Short term target: $10M TVL, $500M vol. Long term: $100M TVL, $2B vol.

  • Highlight any known liquidity commitments.

Aside from Boyco, various platforms are starting to integrate to “re-sell” the 3pool rewards in exchange for liquidity from their communities. TurtleDAO is the first live that has contributed ~$500k TVL (see announcement) with many others currently integrating.

Synergies with Other Protocols:

  • Will this contract feed into any yield aggregators, lending markets, or liquid staking derivatives on Berachain?

Euler & ZeroLend has already integrated the previous 3pool contract as collateral. We are exploring synergies with Dolomite to further increase avenues for lending.

Marketing / Promotion:

  • Are there plans to co-market with another project to bootstrap liquidity?

Yes incentives are co-provided between BurrBear and Beraborrow.

Long-Term Vision:

  • How could this reward vault evolve over time?

This reward vault will serve to grow cornerstone liquidity for USD stablecoins initially, but eventually as base liquidity for other majors and RWA tokens (starting with twinfinance.io/ going live with tokenized stocks vs 4pool tokens) to give Berachain real world utility as liquidity deepens on chain and the ecosystem matures.

7. Verification

Please post the following text with the provided X account:

“Submitted Reward Vault Request for [Contract Name] on protocol [Protocol Name] with incentive tokens [incentive token 1], [incentive token 2]”

2 Likes
2

Hi team, at the time of submission, the following concerns were identified:

  • Please provide a valid reward vault address for this staking token.
  • Number of staking token holders is below the minimum threshold (Minimum over 100 Holders)
  • A NECT:HONEY:USDC:USDT0 Multi Stable Pool currently does not exist on BurrBear

Please note that the following feedback doesn’t represent the opinions of the BGT Foundation. It is contextual feedback from the Bera ecosystem team with respect to publicly stated guidelines.

With the following changes implemented, this application should be a better candidate for a Reward Vault.

3

Hi BeraLabs Team,

Thank you for the prompt reply. In response to your points above:

  1. The reward vault address is Reward Vault | BeraHub, also linked in the Tyepform.

  2. Number of staking token holders should be referred from previous USDC.e/NECT/HONEY (3pool) holder count, as it will be subsumed into the new 4pool. Please note that while Berascan reflects a current holder count of 191, the actual number is far greater as >80% of the LP is currently staked in the existing BeraHub reward vault.

  3. The pool had already been made at the time of the original post; however it does not yet have the “Curated” tag, which prevents it from showing up on the front end immediately. Disabling the “Curated” filter on our front end will enable you to view the pool.

Ps. While the pool currently does not have much liquidity or holders at the moment, please bear in mind that the 4pool is a direct upgrade to the 3pool, and will subsume the entirety of the existing 3pool. Hence, the relevant statistics such as amount of liquidity and number of token holders should be referenced from existing 3pool metrics.

Please reach out if there are any further concerns.

1 Like