General (non-BEX) RFRV Reward Vault Request for Kodiak Island OOGA-WBERA-1%

Reward Vaults
1

Reward Vault Request for Kodiak Island OOGA-WBERA-1%

Proposer Details

Protocol Details

Contract / Pool Details

  • Contract Name: Kodiak Island OOGA-WBERA 1%
  • Contract Address: 0x9b155cf7a4e5911ac35ab2173d0f58e1d39570fd
  • Type / Config: Standard AMM Pool
  • How it Works: Kodiak Islands are ERC20-wrapped Kodiak V3 positions, designed to always stay “in-range” for Berachain Proof of Liquidity.
  • Fees: 1% fee tier
  • TVL & Volume:
    • $300K in Kodiak Island
    • $300K in V3 Pool
    • $3.917M volume to date
  • >10% Holders:
    • Protocol-owned liquidity has the majority share: 0x259DE9E4d6751bfd0F4e538424dFCBBf36fE2C33
  • Upgradable?: No
  • Control: Multisig
  • Contract Control Details: The “manager” controls rebalancing ranges for active liquidity.
  • Verified?: Yes
  • Pausable?: Yes – monitored by HyperNative with pause permissions; unpause by manager multisig.
  • Oracles Used?: No

Token Details

Token 1

  • Name: Wrapped Bera
  • Symbol: wBERA

Token 2

  • Name: Ooga Token
  • Symbol: OOGA
  • Address: 0x009af46Df68DB0E76BFe9EA35663f6Ed17877956
  • Tokenomics & Vesting:
  • >10% Holders:
    • Ecosystem: 0x9596F1bA311DBb8e8a4ADd7c9e99fAa2E4Ac84b6
    • Investor Admin: 0x2CDE9919e81b20B4B33DD562a48a84b54C48F00C
    • Community Incentives: 0xEadB37114E06a9c3Ae9B6afE31dEb567CcdE1B36
    • Team: 0x14eFEcC751494a14d624c3595651aCe3ef4bbA54
  • Relationship w/ Validators: N/A
  • Total Supply Cap: 100M
  • Circulating Supply: 16.5M
  • Type: Utility
  • Details:
    • $OOGA can be bonded into $bOOGA
    • $bOOGA can be allocated to modules
    • Revenue share
    • Allocated $bOOGA receives additional $OOGA
  • Control: Multisig
  • Verified?: Yes
  • Custom Functions?: N/A (Standard ERC20)

Token / Project Background + Incentive Token Whitelist

Tokens:

  • Wrapped Bera (wBERA)
  • Ooga Token (OOGA)

Required Incentive Data:

  • Annual Incentive Cap: Up to 150,000 BERA
  • Decision Making: Revenue-based via multisig and aggregator income
  • Incentive Manager Address:
    0x35aE1620F0237D68D44d74242BF1B244F3d535cd

Growth, Community & Ecosystem Impact

Why This Contract Matters

  • Enables deeper liquidity for OOGA-WBERA
  • Supports Berachain ecosystem with capital-efficient liquidity
  • Strengthens trade execution on $OOGA

Potential TVL / Volume

  • Expected Liquidity: +$1M
  • Liquidity Commitments: N/A

Protocol Synergies

  • Infrared

Marketing

  • Co-marketing plans: N/A

Long-Term Vision

Over time, this reward vault can evolve into a foundational liquidity source for the Berachain ecosystem. As more products within the Ooga Booga collective go live and demand for $OOGA increases, the OOGA-WBERA pair will serve as a core trading route, enabling deeper integrations with DeFi protocols such as yield aggregators, lending markets, and derivatives platforms.

With continued reinvestment of aggregator revenue, we aim for this vault to become a blue-chip liquidity hub, supporting both trading efficiency and protocol-native incentive loops. This could ultimately position OOGA-WBERA as a keystone pair within Berachain’s proof of liquidity framework — a reliable, highly-utilized pool that underpins broader DeFi composability on the chain.

4 Likes
2

Hi team, thanks for the proposal.

It looks like the majority of supply is Protocol Owned Liquidity - please keep in mind that no more than 40% of a Reward Vault may be POL.

Please note that the following feedback doesn’t represent the opinions of the BGT Foundation.
It is contextual feedback from the Bera ecosystem team with respect to publicly stated guidelines.

With the following changes implemented, this application should be a better candidate for a Reward Vault.

1 Like
3

Henlo,

Dears my comment its not about OOGA, but consider that this requirement is incorrect assumption because LP being build after the WL, not before. You know what impact on price there might be because of receiving WL, beras don’t want to be impacted by IL without incentivites (BGT), So it would be reasonable to skip this requirement and come back to this 2 weeks after WL, if there is still more 40% of protocol owned LIQ, then revoke wl.

2 Likes
4

100% agree with bajin. Adding LP at the wrong time can expose you to significant IL

1 Like
6

I agree with this approach generally, but there is not clear guidelines on “how often the requirement is checked” and “how long before delist” - also what happens if you’re at 40% and then market crashes and bunch of community LPs pull out? Until these guidelines are published, it makes sense to me to err on the side of caution and ensure the < 40% concentration is enforced. I understand this makes it difficult to attract community liquidity.